• BlacksLaw9thEdition.just a small one only 1943 pages
    BlacksLaw9thEdition.just a small one only 1943 pages
    File Type: pdf
    Like
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares 533 Views
  • Gospel of Q, Jesus 20 pages
    Gospel of Q, Jesus 20 pages
    File Type: pdf
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1296 Views
  • In early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month of documents submitted by Pfizer, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published.

    Sadly, one of the most recent documents published by the FDA, saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. Proving that medicine regulators the mainstream media, Fact Checkers and Pfizer have all been lying to you.
    In early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month of documents submitted by Pfizer, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published. Sadly, one of the most recent documents published by the FDA, saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. Proving that medicine regulators the mainstream media, Fact Checkers and Pfizer have all been lying to you.
    EXPOSE-NEWS.COM
    How to remove the Nanobots, Nanotech & Graphene found in the COVID Injections being transmitted from the Vaccinated from your body
    In an era marked by the infiltration of graphene nanomaterials/nanobots into various aspects of our lives, concerns over their potential health implications have grown. The inadvertent exposure to …
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1792 Views
  • What to Do
    By Anna Von Reitz


    Thanks to impeccable and duly noted and honored reasoning, we can all prove which jurisdictions the courts are operating in. There are only three (3) choices: Administrative (Corporate Tribunals addressing their own employees), Admiralty (Military Law of the Sea) and Maritime (Otherwise known as Commercial Law, or the Law of Contracts).

    None of these jurisdictions represented by these courts happen to be competent to address average Americans. So in order to gain jurisdiction over you and subject you to their law, they have to pretend that you are something or someone else.

    It's that simple.

    The way to respond to them is equally simple, no matter which of the three choices they invoke.

    If you receive mail, citations, court documents, summons, etc. and it is addressed in your name or what appears to be a variation of your name in all capitals, like this: JOANNE K WARBURY, it's either an Administrative Court or a Maritime Court, presuming that you are responsible for the creation and administration of a Uniform Code Contract Trust of some kind.

    If you receive mail addressed to what appears to be your Proper Name addressed in Upper and Lower Case, like this: Joanne Warbury, it's an Admiralty Court, pretending that you are some kind of Officer or Enlisted Person. For example, if you have mistakenly agreed to act as a "Taxpayer" they can presume that you have voluntarily agreed to collect taxes for the Queen and are acting as a Warrant Officer in the British Merchant Marine Service.

    The moment that you receive -- by hand from a Process Server or via mail -- any official piece of paper from any of these courts, you need to "Return Service". They have offered you the "service" of making a contract offer. The proper response is to "Return Service".

    So, here are the steps you will need to "Return Service" to any and all of these courts:

    1. Take the Summons or Charges or Citation or whatever other piece of paper you first receive, and a red ink pen (which in their signal lingo means "Land Jurisdiction") and you write across the top of the page --- without quotation marks --- "Returned Service: No UCC Contract Trust and no Territorial Office."

    2. Directly under this one sentence and on the right side of the page, you sign using the same red ink pen and using a by-line like this-- By: Ruth Sawyer.

    3. Directly under your Signature, you write the date out, like this: August 21st of 2023.

    4. Make two (2) copies of this page.

    5. Take both pages directly to the Office of the Court Clerk involved and have both date stamped. Give the wet-ink original copy to the Clerk. Keep your copy for your records.

    And that's it. That's all you should have to do, and it forestalls any further action in 90% of all cases, without further harassment.

    Why?

    First of all, because you have made the proper reply by "Returning Service" they can't hold you in contempt of court.

    Second, because you have already returned service to all venues --- Maritime and Administrative are answered by "no UCC Contract Trust" and Admiralty is answered by "no Territorial Office"-- they have no leg to stand on to pursue you like a rabbit running from one jurisdiction to the next. You've quashed their whole shooting match.

    Now, you are probably wondering --- why does she say this works in "90% of all cases" instead of all cases?

    Because as I have told you repeatedly, 90% of all the Acts of Congress do not pertain to us, but what about the 10% that do?

    That's why 90% of all cases are misaddressed to us, but there are some that may actually hold water.

    A few.

    So let's review that aspect to give you some more thinking points.

    If you are a Federal or State-of-State Contractor, you may have Federal Income and you may owe a Federal Income Tax as a result.
    What to Do By Anna Von Reitz Thanks to impeccable and duly noted and honored reasoning, we can all prove which jurisdictions the courts are operating in. There are only three (3) choices: Administrative (Corporate Tribunals addressing their own employees), Admiralty (Military Law of the Sea) and Maritime (Otherwise known as Commercial Law, or the Law of Contracts). None of these jurisdictions represented by these courts happen to be competent to address average Americans. So in order to gain jurisdiction over you and subject you to their law, they have to pretend that you are something or someone else. It's that simple. The way to respond to them is equally simple, no matter which of the three choices they invoke. If you receive mail, citations, court documents, summons, etc. and it is addressed in your name or what appears to be a variation of your name in all capitals, like this: JOANNE K WARBURY, it's either an Administrative Court or a Maritime Court, presuming that you are responsible for the creation and administration of a Uniform Code Contract Trust of some kind. If you receive mail addressed to what appears to be your Proper Name addressed in Upper and Lower Case, like this: Joanne Warbury, it's an Admiralty Court, pretending that you are some kind of Officer or Enlisted Person. For example, if you have mistakenly agreed to act as a "Taxpayer" they can presume that you have voluntarily agreed to collect taxes for the Queen and are acting as a Warrant Officer in the British Merchant Marine Service. The moment that you receive -- by hand from a Process Server or via mail -- any official piece of paper from any of these courts, you need to "Return Service". They have offered you the "service" of making a contract offer. The proper response is to "Return Service". So, here are the steps you will need to "Return Service" to any and all of these courts: 1. Take the Summons or Charges or Citation or whatever other piece of paper you first receive, and a red ink pen (which in their signal lingo means "Land Jurisdiction") and you write across the top of the page --- without quotation marks --- "Returned Service: No UCC Contract Trust and no Territorial Office." 2. Directly under this one sentence and on the right side of the page, you sign using the same red ink pen and using a by-line like this-- By: Ruth Sawyer. 3. Directly under your Signature, you write the date out, like this: August 21st of 2023. 4. Make two (2) copies of this page. 5. Take both pages directly to the Office of the Court Clerk involved and have both date stamped. Give the wet-ink original copy to the Clerk. Keep your copy for your records. And that's it. That's all you should have to do, and it forestalls any further action in 90% of all cases, without further harassment. Why? First of all, because you have made the proper reply by "Returning Service" they can't hold you in contempt of court. Second, because you have already returned service to all venues --- Maritime and Administrative are answered by "no UCC Contract Trust" and Admiralty is answered by "no Territorial Office"-- they have no leg to stand on to pursue you like a rabbit running from one jurisdiction to the next. You've quashed their whole shooting match. Now, you are probably wondering --- why does she say this works in "90% of all cases" instead of all cases? Because as I have told you repeatedly, 90% of all the Acts of Congress do not pertain to us, but what about the 10% that do? That's why 90% of all cases are misaddressed to us, but there are some that may actually hold water. A few. So let's review that aspect to give you some more thinking points. If you are a Federal or State-of-State Contractor, you may have Federal Income and you may owe a Federal Income Tax as a result.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 3183 Views